Hello everyone... can you please help me list the LATER Versions of FORTRAN?
I dont know what comes next after the release of FORTRAN 90... please help

This post has been edited by qaz1134: 8 Jul, 2009 - 02:48 AM

Fortran. Click the very first result link.

The real question is, why you had trouble doing this much...

This post has been edited by Oler1s: 8 Jul, 2009 - 03:54 PM

uhmm Thanks but No... I already googled it . thats why i came here for help.... ???? Am I sooo stupid to ask this kind of question? sooo sorry that i waste your time...

This post has been edited by qaz1134: 13 Jul, 2009 - 07:12 AM

When people defend themselves with an argument along the lines of "Sorry I'm not a genius", red flags go up in my head.

Let's look at the first Google result, which is the Wikipedia page on Fortran. Your post suggests that you know about the earlier versions of Fortran. In such a case, looking at the table of contents, you would have noticed that the history section lists the Fortran versions, and could have just read off the Fortran 90, Fortran 95, Fortran 2003, and Fortran 2008.

But let's say the table of contents didn't clue you in perhaps because you didn't really notice it at first, or because you don't know about any of the versions of Fortran. In such case, you would have to resort to reading the text. The second paragraph says "Successive versions have added support for processing of character-based data (FORTRAN 77), array programming, module-based programming and object-based programming (Fortran 90 / 95), and object-oriented and generic programming (Fortran 2003)." You've just seen in the context of versions, F77, 90, 95, and 2003, the major versions Fortran programmers care about now.

Let's say you still weren't sure. Further reading down the page, under the heading history, and so on, would have you given you complete overview of the versions of Fortran.

Here are the possible situations you are in:

- You didn't hit the wikipedia page, in which case, you never bothered to click on the link I gave you and then click on the first link. I.E., you just ignored my directions.
- You did hit the Wikipedia page.

In which case,
- you didn't take the few minutes to do any reading
- you are outright unable to read.

A review of your previous posts suggests you have enough command of the English language to do the reading. The other two options suggest laziness on your part.

Unless you want to argue that clicking on my Google link, clicking on the first result and reading one webpage takes some extraordinary intelligence.

Ouch.. don't get up man.. just wait for the ten count.

I will say that to grow the population of the website.. this kind of thing is not really the best PR.
Remember DIC is an acronym.

Aet