[jerinho]

hi all im new here and this is my very 1st entry

i am a javafx course finisher who yet to build any single application related to javafx script. but it start to piss me off after i read the oracle announcement about the javafx script discontinuance plan. actually the announcement is sometimes earlier than my alert. for myself it is a good language which should be an great alternative for tedious style of graphic or animation developing using ordinary java language. just like html+javascript in a single syntax format, a programmer way for flash like application. somewhere i think this choices provision is better than what microsoft's offer of c# and vb. we dont need two same purpose language differ in syntax format, but if one suggesting a plan to discontinue html and use them as javascript api instead, the idea is totally ridiculous, unacceptable. then imho it is same to javafx

[doveraudio]

jerinho, on 13 December 2010 - 02:51 PM, said:

hi all im new here and this is my very 1st entry

i am a javafx course finisher who yet to build any single application related to javafx script. but it start to piss me off after i read the oracle announcement about the javafx script discontinuance plan. actually the announcement is sometimes earlier than my alert. for myself it is a good language which should be an great alternative for tedious style of graphic or animation developing using ordinary java language. just like html+javascript in a single syntax format, a programmer way for flash like application. somewhere i think this choices provision is better than what microsoft's offer of c# and vb. we dont need two same purpose language differ in syntax format, but if one suggesting a plan to discontinue html and use them as javascript api instead, the idea is totally ridiculous, unacceptable. then imho it is same to javafx

go start a project on sourceforge to create a 1:1 gnu replacement. i bet you'll get some coders willing to help.