Why do you still use VB6 in the era of .net?

  • (6 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »

85 Replies - 13191 Views - Last Post: 24 March 2011 - 04:55 PM Rate Topic: ***** 1 Votes

#1 AdamSpeight2008  Icon User is offline

  • MrCupOfT
  • member icon


Reputation: 2263
  • View blog
  • Posts: 9,469
  • Joined: 29-May 08

Why do you still use VB6 in the era of .net?

Post icon  Posted 09 February 2011 - 02:38 PM

*
POPULAR

A few questions to start off the discussion.

Why do you still use it?
What are the barriers / issues preventing you?
Is the learning curve of .net too steep?

This post has been edited by AdamSpeight2008: 09 February 2011 - 05:14 PM

Is This A Good Question/Topic? 6
  • +

Replies To: Why do you still use VB6 in the era of .net?

#2 Curtis Rutland  Icon User is online

  • (╯□)╯︵ (~ .o.)~
  • member icon


Reputation: 4497
  • View blog
  • Posts: 7,850
  • Joined: 08-June 10

Re: Why do you still use VB6 in the era of .net?

Posted 09 February 2011 - 02:42 PM

I'm going to make a prediction for at least one popular answer:

Spoiler

This post has been edited by insertAlias: 09 February 2011 - 02:43 PM

Was This Post Helpful? 3
  • +
  • -

#3 BobRodes  Icon User is offline

  • Your Friendly Local Curmudgeon
  • member icon

Reputation: 574
  • View blog
  • Posts: 2,989
  • Joined: 19-May 09

Re: Why do you still use VB6 in the era of .net?

Posted 09 February 2011 - 02:43 PM

Overhead.
Was This Post Helpful? 0
  • +
  • -

#4 Curtis Rutland  Icon User is online

  • (╯□)╯︵ (~ .o.)~
  • member icon


Reputation: 4497
  • View blog
  • Posts: 7,850
  • Joined: 08-June 10

Re: Why do you still use VB6 in the era of .net?

Posted 09 February 2011 - 02:45 PM

Can you elaborate on that a bit?
Was This Post Helpful? 0
  • +
  • -

#5 Guest_Jim*


Reputation:

Re: Why do you still use VB6 in the era of .net?

Posted 09 February 2011 - 03:10 PM

I still use VB6 because I'm a one-man shop supporting a couple of apps that I've developed over the course of 10 years. I went to a VB.Net class in 2003(?) and started the migration from VB6 to .Net. I had several failed starts. Just when I would be making some progress, there would be some new initiative to add to the existing (VB6) codebase, and the VB.Net would get back-burnered. At this point I'm closer than ever to getting the larger of my two main apps converted. It's still months or more away, though.

Overhead is a factor, I think. Sure there are lots of nice little features in VB.Net that should make things *seem* faster. But, it's not! And, there's a learning curve involved with exploiting those features besides.

My understanding is that Micro$oft hasn't converted all their apps to .Net. Why should they expect that I/we can do what they can't/won't?

Jim
Was This Post Helpful? 1

#6 Curtis Rutland  Icon User is online

  • (╯□)╯︵ (~ .o.)~
  • member icon


Reputation: 4497
  • View blog
  • Posts: 7,850
  • Joined: 08-June 10

Re: Why do you still use VB6 in the era of .net?

Posted 09 February 2011 - 03:16 PM

I always find humor in someone who develops in a Microsoft-made language calling them "Micro$oft".
Was This Post Helpful? 1
  • +
  • -

#7 Guest_Jim*


Reputation:

Re: Why do you still use VB6 in the era of .net?

Posted 09 February 2011 - 03:31 PM

I do it for money. You?

Jim
Was This Post Helpful? 0

#8 AdamSpeight2008  Icon User is offline

  • MrCupOfT
  • member icon


Reputation: 2263
  • View blog
  • Posts: 9,469
  • Joined: 29-May 08

Re: Why do you still use VB6 in the era of .net?

Posted 09 February 2011 - 03:40 PM

What about the soon approaching and impeding lack of support for the vb6 runtime, in the OS?
Microsoft no long officially offer support of the language.
Was This Post Helpful? 0
  • +
  • -

#9 Martyr2  Icon User is offline

  • Programming Theoretician
  • member icon

Reputation: 4353
  • View blog
  • Posts: 12,160
  • Joined: 18-April 07

Re: Why do you still use VB6 in the era of .net?

Posted 09 February 2011 - 04:27 PM

One thing I have noticed about VB6 users over the years is that they are a group that just won't die. Even if Microsoft cuts the cord on VB6, they will some how find a way. I think they inspired the line in Jurassic Park where they find the eggs and say "Nature finds a way". Just replace "Nature" with "VB6ers"

;)
Was This Post Helpful? 2
  • +
  • -

#10 AdamSpeight2008  Icon User is offline

  • MrCupOfT
  • member icon


Reputation: 2263
  • View blog
  • Posts: 9,469
  • Joined: 29-May 08

Re: Why do you still use VB6 in the era of .net?

Posted 09 February 2011 - 05:16 PM

Even when there is help?
Was This Post Helpful? 0
  • +
  • -

#11 motcom  Icon User is offline

  • D.I.C Lover
  • member icon

Reputation: 290
  • View blog
  • Posts: 1,371
  • Joined: 16-June 08

Re: Why do you still use VB6 in the era of .net?

Posted 10 February 2011 - 03:51 AM

Funny the 'no more support' story. With my MSDN Subscription I can still download old VB Versions...

I updgraded from VB 6 to 2003, then from 2003 to 2005 (a bad move here as the 2005 was so unstable before the service pack, then from 2005 to 2008 with sp1 (best thing ever), now from 2008 to 2010 (lots and lots of problems, the report writer from SQL had changed as well). But at least Team Foundation Server is cheapter now and that Helps tons...
Was This Post Helpful? 0
  • +
  • -

#12 baavgai  Icon User is offline

  • Dreaming Coder
  • member icon

Reputation: 5846
  • View blog
  • Posts: 12,705
  • Joined: 16-October 07

Re: Why do you still use VB6 in the era of .net?

Posted 10 February 2011 - 05:41 AM

Sadly true. This made my hair curl: Support Statement for Visual Basic 6.0 on Windows Vista, Windows Server 2008 and Windows 7

Microsoft tries to age out the crap is doesn't want to deal with, like any other company. However, if a large enough customer still uses type writers, IBM will still provide them. My sense is that a few major players can't cut the VB6 cord. Until they do, VB6 will remain in it's undead state.

I must admit, I always assume most of our VB6 questions come from the same backwaters that haven't abandoned Turbo C. It doesn't surprise me VB6 is still used in the wild; so is COBOL. What surprises me is that people write new programs in it.
Was This Post Helpful? 0
  • +
  • -

#13 marinus  Icon User is offline

  • D.I.C Addict
  • member icon

Reputation: 135
  • View blog
  • Posts: 575
  • Joined: 14-April 10

Re: Why do you still use VB6 in the era of .net?

Posted 10 February 2011 - 06:13 AM

I am forced to use VB6 unfortunately ..

VB6 is good as a programming language but i really don't like its syntax .

This post has been edited by marinus: 10 February 2011 - 06:21 AM

Was This Post Helpful? 0
  • +
  • -

#14 CodeGrappler  Icon User is offline

  • D.I.C Head
  • member icon

Reputation: 41
  • View blog
  • Posts: 120
  • Joined: 29-November 10

Re: Why do you still use VB6 in the era of .net?

Posted 10 February 2011 - 07:30 AM

View PostinsertAlias, on 09 February 2011 - 02:42 PM, said:

I'm going to make a prediction for at least one popular answer:

Spoiler


This.

However I am in the process of converting our applications to C# .NET, we are killing VB all together.
Was This Post Helpful? 0
  • +
  • -

#15 raziel_  Icon User is offline

  • Like a lollipop
  • member icon

Reputation: 464
  • View blog
  • Posts: 4,255
  • Joined: 25-March 09

Re: Why do you still use VB6 in the era of .net?

Posted 10 February 2011 - 08:01 AM

Because i like it and i want to :) But srsly its more of a hobby then a job to me. I like the syntax and that you have to do lots of the things that you have implement in .net your self
Was This Post Helpful? 1
  • +
  • -

  • (6 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »