New Topic/Question
Reply
personally, I'd use a list (<ul>) for that along with a separate style sheet.
19 Replies - 6116 Views - Last Post: 23 January 2013 - 10:58 AM
MultiQuote
#17
ernestlwl
- New D.I.C Head
Reputation: 1
- Posts: 27
- Joined: 13-September 11
Re: HTML Table vs Pure CSS DIV: Which loads faster?
Posted 09 February 2012 - 07:39 AM
Dormilich, on 09 February 2012 - 06:58 AM, said:
personally, I'd use a list (<ul>) for that along with a separate style sheet.
I see, using <fieldset> and <legend> seems really good.
I can't really see the difference in using divs or fieldsets tho.
Are fieldsets only good for forms?
Was This Post Helpful?
0
#18
Dormilich
- 痛覚残留
-
Reputation: 2935
- Posts: 7,689
- Joined: 08-June 10
Re: HTML Table vs Pure CSS DIV: Which loads faster?
Posted 09 February 2012 - 07:46 AM
fieldsets are allowed only in forms. and they bear a special meaning (called semantics, something like "this contained form data forms a group" (like personal data, properties of an object or a buttonset, etc.))
Was This Post Helpful?
0
#19
Lemur
- OpenBSD Head
-
Reputation: 1120
- Posts: 3,076
- Joined: 28-November 09
Re: HTML Table vs Pure CSS DIV: Which loads faster?
Posted 09 February 2012 - 07:59 AM
A Div/CSS version would be far more dynamic and flexible in the long run, but as said before requires more of an initial time investment.
Was This Post Helpful?
0
#20
Tooniouxuh
- New D.I.C Head
Reputation: 0
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 23-January 13
Re: HTML Table vs Pure CSS DIV: Which loads faster?
Posted 23 January 2013 - 10:58 AM
Everything is clear , thank you ...
Was This Post Helpful?
0
|
|
| 