New Topic/Question
modi123_1, on 17 August 2012 - 09:10 AM, said:
Troll 2.
Just because a movie is a perfect storm of horrible doesn't mean you should avoid it, there's some cult following about how bad that film is.
114 Replies - 7479 Views - Last Post: 13 September 2012 - 07:25 AM
#106
WolfCoder
- Isn't a volcano just an angry hill?
-
Reputation: 753
- Posts: 7,552
- Joined: 05-May 05
Re: Movies you should avoid
Posted 18 August 2012 - 09:28 PM
Just because a movie is a perfect storm of horrible doesn't mean you should avoid it, there's some cult following about how bad that film is.
Was This Post Helpful?
0
MultiQuote
#107
gabehabe
- GabehabeSwamp
-
Reputation: 1346
- Posts: 10,918
- Joined: 06-February 08
Re: Movies you should avoid
Posted 20 August 2012 - 12:55 AM
None. I'll watch any movie once, because I like to laugh at the bad ones. I've seen some brilliant(ly terrible) films just by looking for ones that people say to avoid. 
Hell, I'd even watch Twilight if it was on TV while there was nothing else on and I was too hungover to play games.
Hell, I'd even watch Twilight if it was on TV while there was nothing else on and I was too hungover to play games.
Was This Post Helpful?
0
#108
motcom
- D.I.C Lover
-
Reputation: 288
- Posts: 1,371
- Joined: 16-June 08
Re: Movies you should avoid
Posted 28 August 2012 - 03:31 AM
2010: Moby Dick
IMDb link
what a peice of nonsence..
EDIT: quote from a guy
IMDb link
what a peice of nonsence..
EDIT: quote from a guy
Quote
Lets make make something clear, this is low budget. Whats worse is that any technical aspect that could possibly be wrong, IS wrong. A low budget is no excuse for not doing some basic research on the internet before you being production, its free after all.
We have navy officers wearing army field uniforms, we have have a one legged submarine captain and and helicopter attacking a submerged nuclear submarine with a machine gun, and doing enough damage to make the 400feet sub shake like it was being depth charged!
All the special effects and animations looks like they transfered in from the eighties and and most of the sets are awful as well. The ultramodern submarine looks like a run down Russian factory on the inside, and the instrumentation seems borrowed from a lesser Sci-Fi production.
So why did I still give it a 4? Well I managed to sit through the movie. I'll admit that I was desperately bored, but still. The acting is not as horrible as you might expect, but still far from anything memorable. And the basic story is not hopeless either, with a large studio this might have become an OK film on par with godzilla or king kong. However any similarities with the original book are nowhere to be seen, besides the big whale and the obsessed captain that is.
The 4 I gave it is being generous, but I have seen movies that are worse, and still scored higher on IMDb.
We have navy officers wearing army field uniforms, we have have a one legged submarine captain and and helicopter attacking a submerged nuclear submarine with a machine gun, and doing enough damage to make the 400feet sub shake like it was being depth charged!
All the special effects and animations looks like they transfered in from the eighties and and most of the sets are awful as well. The ultramodern submarine looks like a run down Russian factory on the inside, and the instrumentation seems borrowed from a lesser Sci-Fi production.
So why did I still give it a 4? Well I managed to sit through the movie. I'll admit that I was desperately bored, but still. The acting is not as horrible as you might expect, but still far from anything memorable. And the basic story is not hopeless either, with a large studio this might have become an OK film on par with godzilla or king kong. However any similarities with the original book are nowhere to be seen, besides the big whale and the obsessed captain that is.
The 4 I gave it is being generous, but I have seen movies that are worse, and still scored higher on IMDb.
This post has been edited by motcom: 28 August 2012 - 03:34 AM
Was This Post Helpful?
0
#110
fromTheSprawl
- Wandering Like A Fool
-
Reputation: 509
- Posts: 2,041
- Joined: 28-December 10
Re: Movies you should avoid
Posted 29 August 2012 - 12:48 AM
Kristen Stewart's best film might be "Panic Room", back when she was young.
Oh yeah, "Vampires Suck" suck.
Oh yeah, "Vampires Suck" suck.
Was This Post Helpful?
0
#111
Abacus-64k
- New D.I.C Head
Reputation: 1
- Posts: 7
- Joined: 09-August 12
Re: Movies you should avoid
Posted 30 August 2012 - 01:38 PM
Birdemic, nuff said.
In case you wish you want to watch it anyways, here is a little reminder just how bad it really is: http://www.youtube.c...h?v=LrxZblVUkMU
In case you wish you want to watch it anyways, here is a little reminder just how bad it really is: http://www.youtube.c...h?v=LrxZblVUkMU
Was This Post Helpful?
0
#113
alzy101
- New D.I.C Head
Reputation: 0
- Posts: 21
- Joined: 22-May 12
Re: Movies you should avoid
Posted 12 September 2012 - 08:51 AM
White Chicks wasn't so bad. 
c'mon. I'd say, avoid about 75% of movies that hit the theater. Though if I had to be more specific, I'd say that recent Adam Sandler movie where he plays himself and his own sister. I hate it so much I don't want to even look up the name (don't tell me either). Never saw it actually to be honest. Don't want to. :I
c'mon. I'd say, avoid about 75% of movies that hit the theater. Though if I had to be more specific, I'd say that recent Adam Sandler movie where he plays himself and his own sister. I hate it so much I don't want to even look up the name (don't tell me either). Never saw it actually to be honest. Don't want to. :I
Was This Post Helpful?
0
|
|
| 