[macosxnerd101]

Quote

I will bet you on MathOps source code and my upcoming project if it's not. lol i just ran spybot.

I'll take some of this instead.

[modi123_1]

AhmerjavedC++, on 31 January 2013 - 12:31 PM, said:

supersloth, on 31 January 2013 - 11:29 AM, said:

it is. it ABSOLUTELY is.

I will bet you on MathOps source code and my upcoming project if it's not. lol i just ran spybot.

Wow, wait; what? I am confused if this somehow outlines a bet, a location, or is spam from the op's infested machine.

[Craig328]

This post has been edited by Craig328: 31 January 2013 - 12:34 PM

[WolfCoder]

I assume the semantics to be:

{precondition: computer is being slowed down by X}
I will bet you {bet on X}
on MathOps source code {X = "MathOps source code"}
my upcoming project if it's not {X != "MathOps source code" -> X = "my upcoming project"}
lol i just ran spybot. {statement not including X}

Then evaluating:

("MathOps source code" AND ("my upcoming project" AND NOT "MathOps source code"))

if X = "MathOps source code" and X != "my upcoming project" then (True AND (False AND NOT True)) -> (True AND False) -> False
if X != "MathOps source code" and X = "my upcoming project" then (False AND (True AND NOT False)) -> (False AND True) -> False
if X != "MathOps source code" and X != "my upcoming project" then (False AND (False AND NOT False)) -> (False AND False) -> False
if X = "MathOps source code" and X = "my upcoming project" then (True AND (True AND NOT True)) -> (True AND False) -> False

Concludes that it can't be "MathOps source code" or "my upcoming project". You will be incapable of winning a bet that has no satisfying conditions for any assignment X.

[modi123_1]

I think I am still lost with "on MathOps source code". Is that some sort of back alley way gambling site where you toss in quality lines of your work?

[NeoTifa]

Wtf is even going on?

[h4nnib4l]

@Wolf - you can't assume that "my upcoming project" automatically falsifies "MathOps source code". What if ahmerjammer is offering both?

[jon.kiparsky]

NeoTifa, on 31 January 2013 - 05:59 PM, said:

Wtf is even going on?

Don't touch it! It's made of pure stupid!

[lordofduct]

Someone should harness the power of that stupid.

[jon.kiparsky]

Well, that would be great, but we'd need a source of pure anti-stupid, and where are we going to find that?

[Nykc]

[Craig328]

Srsly. I have no idea.

[modi123_1]

Thanks.. now I will be humming 'Be our Guest' all day long.

Spoiler

[BenignDesign]

[WolfCoder]

h4nnib4l, on 01 February 2013 - 07:30 AM, said:

@Wolf - you can't assume that "my upcoming project" automatically falsifies "MathOps source code". What if ahmerjammer is offering both?

No, you can see I did check for both and neither. Those cases still evaluate to false.


Of course, we're assuming my semantic interpretation is even remotely correct to whatever the intentional semantics were.