New Topic/Question
Reply
well then, I’d remove it and check with var_dump() the status of $Check in every concerned script.
113 Replies - 3985 Views - Last Post: 23 March 2013 - 11:52 PM
Rate Topic:
MultiQuote
#92
Darkranger85
- D.I.C Head
Reputation: 1
- Posts: 139
- Joined: 31-August 12
Re: First foray into OOP: Correct implementation?
Posted 13 March 2013 - 05:53 AM
Aye captain! 
Checking now!
Checking now!
Was This Post Helpful?
0
#93
Darkranger85
- D.I.C Head
Reputation: 1
- Posts: 139
- Joined: 31-August 12
Re: First foray into OOP: Correct implementation?
Posted 13 March 2013 - 06:03 AM
Alright, it looks like it's in there.
object(content)[9]
protected 'Check' =>
object(check)[3]
protected 'pdo' =>
object(PDO)[2]
Was This Post Helpful?
0
#95
Darkranger85
- D.I.C Head
Reputation: 1
- Posts: 139
- Joined: 31-August 12
Re: First foray into OOP: Correct implementation?
Posted 13 March 2013 - 06:36 AM
Yepper
Was This Post Helpful?
0
#96
Dormilich
- 痛覚残留
-
Reputation: 2899
- Posts: 7,555
- Joined: 08-June 10
Re: First foray into OOP: Correct implementation?
Posted 13 March 2013 - 06:44 AM
and the loggedIn() method belongs to the check class? then $Check->loggedIn() must fail since $Check is an instance of content.
Was This Post Helpful?
0
#97
Darkranger85
- D.I.C Head
Reputation: 1
- Posts: 139
- Joined: 31-August 12
Re: First foray into OOP: Correct implementation?
Posted 13 March 2013 - 06:53 AM
Wait, I'm sorry. I misread your question. I am incorrect, that is the $Content variable.
Here is Check.
Here is Check.
object(check)[3]
protected 'pdo' =>
object(PDO)[2]
Was This Post Helpful?
0
#99
Darkranger85
- D.I.C Head
Reputation: 1
- Posts: 139
- Joined: 31-August 12
Re: First foray into OOP: Correct implementation?
Posted 13 March 2013 - 07:01 AM
Yes
Was This Post Helpful?
0
#101
Darkranger85
- D.I.C Head
Reputation: 1
- Posts: 139
- Joined: 31-August 12
Re: First foray into OOP: Correct implementation?
Posted 13 March 2013 - 07:09 AM
Yep. No change.
If I am not logged in and try to access a protected page it gives the undefined error, and if I am logged in and try to access a page logged in users aren't supposed to access it gives the same error.
If I am not logged in and try to access a protected page it gives the undefined error, and if I am logged in and try to access a page logged in users aren't supposed to access it gives the same error.
Was This Post Helpful?
0
#103
Darkranger85
- D.I.C Head
Reputation: 1
- Posts: 139
- Joined: 31-August 12
Re: First foray into OOP: Correct implementation?
Posted 13 March 2013 - 07:27 AM
No, here is the code
$Check = new check($db);
Was This Post Helpful?
0
#104
Darkranger85
- D.I.C Head
Reputation: 1
- Posts: 139
- Joined: 31-August 12
Re: First foray into OOP: Correct implementation?
Posted 20 March 2013 - 12:18 PM
Alright, I'm trying to use FirePHP to debug the script but. . . I can't make heads or tails of how to use the darn thing.
Was This Post Helpful?
0
#105
andrewsw
- Provides a RESTful service
-
Reputation: 1085
- Posts: 3,385
- Joined: 12-December 12
Re: First foray into OOP: Correct implementation?
Posted 20 March 2013 - 01:27 PM
Darkranger85, on 20 March 2013 - 07:18 PM, said:
Alright, I'm trying to use FirePHP to debug the script but. . . I can't make heads or tails of how to use the darn thing.
FirePHP seems intended for Ajax requests rather than general PHP debugging.
There are PHP debuggers available. I seem to recall that the one in NetBeans was the easiest to configure.
Personally I tend to regard them as more trouble than they are worth. Tactical use of print_r, var_dump, echoes, et al., together with enabling all error reporting, is quicker and easier. By the time you've struggled to configure, and learn to use, the debugger, you could have found the error with a few simple echoes
. I may be wrong (probably am in this regard) but I am suspicious that configuring the debugger itself could impact the way the page behaves - cf. Heisenberg
This post has been edited by andrewsw: 20 March 2013 - 01:39 PM
Was This Post Helpful?
0
|
|
| 