Heres my portfolio site (not much in it at the mo), its in html for now but a flash version is in the works. btw the links in the cv section dont work yet.
http://www.intro-spect.co.uk
thx in advance.
Portfolio Site Checkermm site check
Page 1 of 1
7 Replies - 1387 Views - Last Post: 08 July 2002 - 10:44 AM
Replies To: Portfolio Site Check
#2
Re: Portfolio Site Check
Posted 07 July 2002 - 05:19 AM
Very nice use of photos! A great collage of work, I really cant wait to see the flash version, it has a LOT of promise to be great. No complaints here.
Josh Dura
Josh Dura
#3
Re: Portfolio Site Check
Posted 07 July 2002 - 10:34 AM
Ohhh i like ! needs more content , but i love the photos and everything , and the blur effect, its pritty orginal , good work
#4
Re: Portfolio Site Check
Posted 07 July 2002 - 10:44 AM
Na, i dont think it needs any more content.. its perfect
#5
Re: Portfolio Site Check
Posted 07 July 2002 - 01:39 PM
troi oi, i love it! The only thing i would change is the blue color used in introspect title. Can't wait for the flash version.
btw.. you were born in hai phong? how cool. My mom lived near there i think.
btw.. you were born in hai phong? how cool. My mom lived near there i think.
#6
Re: Portfolio Site Check
Posted 07 July 2002 - 05:08 PM
wow, i really like your site 
excellent use of your photos to create that.
excellent use of your photos to create that.
#7
Re: Portfolio Site Check
Posted 08 July 2002 - 10:01 AM
Hi,
sorry-don't really like it.
It will make a top class Flash site, but the images and tables make it a really disjointed experience, when linking throughout.
Looks good, but it felt more like print than interactive motion graphics.
cheers.
sorry-don't really like it.
It will make a top class Flash site, but the images and tables make it a really disjointed experience, when linking throughout.
Looks good, but it felt more like print than interactive motion graphics.
cheers.
#8
Re: Portfolio Site Check
Posted 08 July 2002 - 10:44 AM
poab, on Jul 8 2002, 11:01 AM, said:
Looks good, but it felt more like print than interactive motion graphics.
Who said it was spossed to be 'interactive motion graphics'? lol
Page 1 of 1
|
|

New Topic/Question
Reply



MultiQuote






|