Difference between VB.NET & Visual BasicDifference VB.NET & Visual Basic
Page 1 of 1
14 Replies - 8317 Views - Last Post: 29 July 2008 - 01:01 AM
#1
Difference between VB.NET & Visual Basic
Posted 28 July 2008 - 11:45 AM
Replies To: Difference between VB.NET & Visual Basic
#2
Re: Difference between VB.NET & Visual Basic
Posted 28 July 2008 - 12:30 PM
#3
Re: Difference between VB.NET & Visual Basic
Posted 28 July 2008 - 12:54 PM
Well, I'm not really sure of this. I know that they are very similar languages, although not entirely the same, I suggest someone like Martyr2 or PsychoCoder to fly in here with the explanation...
Here are some examples of the differences in the code...
#4
Re: Difference between VB.NET & Visual Basic
Posted 28 July 2008 - 12:59 PM
@Mods: There is an EXACT duplicate thread of this one in the Visual Basic Forum.
#5
Re: Difference between VB.NET & Visual Basic
Posted 28 July 2008 - 12:59 PM
Locke37, on 28 Jul, 2008 - 12:54 PM, said:
Well, I'm not really sure of this. I know that they are very similar languages, although not entirely the same, I suggest someone like Martyr2 or PsychoCoder to fly in here with the explanation...
Here are some examples of the differences in the code...
Ok Thanks I see now
#6
Re: Difference between VB.NET & Visual Basic
Posted 28 July 2008 - 01:01 PM
#7
Re: Difference between VB.NET & Visual Basic
Posted 28 July 2008 - 01:07 PM
http://www.4guysfrom.../053001-1.shtml
#8
Re: Difference between VB.NET & Visual Basic
Posted 28 July 2008 - 01:13 PM
#9
Re: Difference between VB.NET & Visual Basic
Posted 28 July 2008 - 01:38 PM
1. VB.NET is a truly object-oriented programming language. It supports inheritance, encapsulation and polymorphism.
2. The developer can create web-forms using VB.NET.
3. VB.NET supports web-services.
4. VB.NET supports multi-threading.
5. VB.NET supports structured exception handling.
6. VB.NET has great XML support.
7. Changed syntax.
These are just some of the hundreds of new things, introduced in VB.NET.
This post has been edited by PixelCard: 28 July 2008 - 01:38 PM
#10
Re: Difference between VB.NET & Visual Basic
Posted 28 July 2008 - 01:57 PM
#11
Re: Difference between VB.NET & Visual Basic
Posted 28 July 2008 - 01:59 PM
the one thing i know is that visual basic 6 doesn't need a complier
so u can make a project with it and send it to someone and it will work without any problem
but the visual basic.net needs the .netframework to be installed on the computer that contains the exe file to make it work
that is in all visual studio2005+
visual basic 6 doesn't need the complier
#12
Re: Difference between VB.NET & Visual Basic
Posted 28 July 2008 - 02:15 PM
narmer93, on 28 Jul, 2008 - 01:59 PM, said:
Please, prove it. Show some arguments.
narmer93, on 28 Jul, 2008 - 01:59 PM, said:
Interesting... How the application gets compiled then?
narmer93, on 28 Jul, 2008 - 01:59 PM, said:
but the visual basic.net needs the .netframework to be installed on the computer that contains the exe file to make it work
VB6 also needs some specific libraries to be installed. In this case, the .NET Framework isn't a problem.
#13
Re: Difference between VB.NET & Visual Basic
Posted 28 July 2008 - 02:24 PM
PixelCard, on 28 Jul, 2008 - 01:38 PM, said:
1. VB.NET is a truly object-oriented programming language. It supports inheritance, encapsulation and polymorphism.
2. The developer can create web-forms using VB.NET.
3. VB.NET supports web-services.
4. VB.NET supports multi-threading.
5. VB.NET supports structured exception handling.
6. VB.NET has great XML support.
7. Changed syntax.
These are just some of the hundreds of new things, introduced in VB.NET.
Thanks again PixelCard, thats twice in one day!
#14
Re: Difference between VB.NET & Visual Basic
Posted 28 July 2008 - 04:47 PM
#15
Re: Difference between VB.NET & Visual Basic
Posted 29 July 2008 - 01:01 AM
|
|

New Topic/Question
Reply




MultiQuote









|