[evilme]

I've always thought to myself why can PS3/360 Fanboys get along? Most of the good games dropping in the next year will be on both platforms but yet we still argue about how the same game is gonna be better on this console. IMO PS3 > The 360 In Specs and Gameplay! The PS3 also allows more modding and is great for programmers and tech geeks . But that's just my opinion. Now i wanna hear yours.

[Nykc]

this topic is moot.

I was a Sony fanboy till last year. Xbox 360 hands down best system. Graphics will go to Sony but they still haven't gotten their shit together and Microsoft is well in to developing there next system.

[jjsaw5]

I agree 100% with Nykc.


I have played the PS3 a couple of times, and other the graphics i think the xbox beats it.

Two games that come to mind that PS3 users dont have are Halo and Gears of War.

I don't think PS3 has a game that can match these two. (COD4 does, but i'm talking strictly about games only for PS3).

I could be wrong, but i don't think PS3 offers as much "on-line" features as the xbox.

[evilme]

jjsaw5, on 14 Aug, 2008 - 12:32 PM, said:

I agree 100% with Nykc.


I have played the PS3 a couple of times, and other the graphics i think the xbox beats it.

Two games that come to mind that PS3 users dont have are Halo and Gears of War.

I don't think PS3 has a game that can match these two. (COD4 does, but i'm talking strictly about games only for PS3).

I could be wrong, but i don't think PS3 offers as much "on-line" features as the xbox.

You must be forgeting about Metal Gear Solid 4. It has way better gameplay then halo but not gears of war. Besides Xbox was realeased one year ahead of either gaming platforms. If the ps3 was realeased at the same time you people wouldn't be talking so highly of the 360 like you do now.

But i could be wrong

[PsychoCoder]

WRONG!

The 360 is better than the PS3. The PS3 may have better graphics, not that I could tell when they were side by side, but the 360 will always be bigger simply because of number of games. The PS3 and 360 could have come out on the same day and I would still pick the 360 over the PS3.

No game is as good as Halo, get real

[evilme]

PsychoCoder, on 14 Aug, 2008 - 02:03 PM, said:

WRONG!

The 360 is better than the PS3. The PS3 may have better graphics, not that I could tell when they were side by side, but the 360 will always be bigger simply because of number of games. The PS3 and 360 could have come out on the same day and I would still pick the 360 over the PS3.

No game is as good as Halo, get real

And You Sir... Have FAILED!

No game as good as Hallo. IMO Halo 2 > Halo 3

and besides you just said that 360 has a better variety of games then the ps3 does but if they dropped on the same day then wouldn't they both have the same number of comes or at least a close number

That proves that you like the 360 only because it's the 360. You can prove me wrong but i doubt you can.

And i say all of this in a non disrespectful way

[PsychoCoder]

Well, the 360 had a ton of games for it the day it dropped, can Sony say that about the PS3? Nope they sure cant. I will say that I also prefer the original XBOX over the PS2 as well. I was never really too impressed with any of the PlayStation's from the outset, and was thrilled when the XBOX was released.

Ive played both the PS3 and the 360 and personally I prefer the 360, I guess that could be because of the number of games I have to choose from, I'm not sure. I've just yet to find a solid convincing reason to switch from the XBOX family to the PlayStation family, and until they can offer me one they can ,,!,,

I didn't think they graphics of the PS3 were that much better than the 360, not enough to purchase one over the 360 that's for sure. The PS3 plays Blue-Ray? Why do I need that when I already have a Blue-Ray player.

Can I program games for the PS3, no I cannot but I can for the 360. In most side by side tests done (and this comes from gaming sites) the 360 actually out performs the PS3, and in some by quite a bit.

[jjsaw5]

evilme, on 14 Aug, 2008 - 05:36 PM, said:

PsychoCoder, on 14 Aug, 2008 - 02:03 PM, said:

WRONG!

The 360 is better than the PS3. The PS3 may have better graphics, not that I could tell when they were side by side, but the 360 will always be bigger simply because of number of games. The PS3 and 360 could have come out on the same day and I would still pick the 360 over the PS3.

No game is as good as Halo, get real

And You Sir... Have FAILED!

No game as good as Hallo. IMO Halo 2 > Halo 3

and besides you just said that 360 has a better variety of games then the ps3 does but if they dropped on the same day then wouldn't they both have the same number of comes or at least a close number

That proves that you like the 360 only because it's the 360. You can prove me wrong but i doubt you can.

And i say all of this in a non disrespectful way

No sir you have FAILED. You said metal gear was better then halo but not Gears.

So pretty much what your saying is PS3 can't touch Xbox and never will thanks for proving our point for us

[evilme]

Where are all the ps3 fanboy's when you need them lol

[Xarver]

Xbox 360 has a bunch FPS and high graphic sports games.
PS3 Has tons of variety.
Microsoft has been copying PS3's games
and putting them on their crappy system...

Oh and, the Xbox 360 about a 1 year head start.
Ps3: November 17, 2006
Xbox 360: November 15th, 2005

WOW...

And ever hear of the deadly Red Ring of Death???

This post has been edited by Xarver: 15 August 2008 - 08:56 AM

[capty99]

1. this argument has happened fifty mil;lion times already.

2. the reason the 360 is better is xbox live. thats the most important part about it because the biggest games (note i didn't say majority, just the biggest) are fps multiplayers.

3. mgs4 is sick on the ps3. kthxbye. thats it. the system is nice, and a decent media center.... but as a gaming device the 360 is the platform.

[Xarver]

No.

MGS4 Was one of the most successful games and a lot of people loved it.
And your saying it sucks???
Microsoft got it on their system because obviously they're jealous.
Xbox live sucks because you have to pay money.
Microsoft just wants to rack in cash.
$7.99 a month for "Silver Xbox Live"

I think that's a rip-off. Honestly...

~ Xarver

[jjsaw5]

Xarver, on 15 Aug, 2008 - 12:09 PM, said:

No.

MGS4 Was one of the most successful games and a lot of people loved it.
And your saying it sucks???
Microsoft got it on their system because obviously they're jealous.
Xbox live sucks because you have to pay money.
Microsoft just wants to rack in cash.
$7.99 a month for "Silver Xbox Live"

I think that's a rip-off. Honestly...

~ Xarver

He said it was Sick, translation = good.

Xbox live sucks for people who are cheap.

I have yet to see a good arguement for the PS3. All i have seen is

good graphics (360 has that)
variety of games (360 has that)

Sorry but I can't see anyone making an arguement as to why its better.


Oh and who's fault is that that PS3 was released later then xbox? Sony could have released it the same time, thats their own fault.

I have heard of the red ring of death, if you even look there I started a thread about it.
Still would take xbox over PS3 even with the ring of death


Another thing Xbox has on PS3 is the achievments you can get playing the games. Adds more to the gameplay of the xbox games. And i think you even said in the gameplay vs graphics thread that gameplay wins!

Well ps3 might have better graphics but xbox has better game play

This post has been edited by jjsaw5: 15 August 2008 - 10:05 AM

[Xarver]

Here's a video that burns Xbox 360.
PS3 vs Xbox360.

The Playstation 3 rules!!!

This post has been edited by Xarver: 15 August 2008 - 11:35 AM

[bflosabre91]

360 ftw. better games, better controller(ps3 just got rumble like what, 3 months ago???), better looking(not that it matters),but online experience, better warranty:).

im not saying ps3 is bad, but up until this point there really was no reason for anyone to get a ps3. and even now the only reason is for mgs4. but at $400 for 80gb, it is looking a lot better now. i feel sorry for the fools who spent $600 just to play resistance for a year...