Quote
FAILED: Cory at MIT-DSPG; I gave up on sending this after 31 "temporary" errors.
Failed message follows:
-------
Date: 22 Nov 1982 0028-EST
From: Mel Pleasant <WORKS at RUTGERS>
Subject: WORKS Digest V2 #88
Sender: PLEASANT at RUTGERS at MIT-MC
To: WorkS: ;
Reply-To: WORKS at RUTGERS
Works Digest Monday, 22 November 1982 Volume 2 : Issue 88
Today's Topics:
Notes - Communications Breakthrough,
Hardware - The Corvus Concept,
Programming - Extending the ASCII character set (6 msgs)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mail-from: ARPANET site PARC-MAXC rcvd at 10-Nov-82 2233-EST
Date: 10-Nov-82 19:36:21 PST (Wednesday)
From: Hamilton.es at PARC-MAXC
Subject: Communications Breakthrough
To: Human-nets @ Rutgers
Mail-from: Arpanet host CMU-10A rcvd at 10-NOV-82 0826-PST
Date: 10 November 1982 1126-EST (Wednesday)
From: James.Morris at CMU-10A
To: csl^ at PARC-MAXC, isl^ at PARC-MAXC, junk^ at PARC-MAXC
Subject: Communications Breakthrough
Message-Id: <10Nov82 112614 JM90@CMU-10A>
Because you can't see the person who is sending you electronic
mail you are sometimes uncertain whether they are serious or
joking. Recently, Scott Fahlman at CMU devised a scheme for
annotating one's messages to overcome this problem. If you turn
your head sideways to look at the three characters :-) they look
sort of like a smiling face. Thus, if someone sends you a
message that says "Have you stopped beating your wife?:-)" you
know they are joking. If they say "I need to talk to you :-(",
be prepared for trouble.
Since Scott's original proposal, many further symbols have bee
proposed here:
(:-) for messages dealing with bicycle helmets
@= for messages dealing with nuclear war
<:-) for dumb questions
oo for somebody's head-lights are on messages
o>-<|= for messages of interest to women
~= a candle, to annotate flaming messages
So you see, bit-map displays are really quite unnecessary :->
i thought it was pretty interesting really...
http://www.google.co...nnounce_20.html
and some of the stuff is hilarious, and some is kinda weird, i dunno, go take a look... you older folks will enjoy it even more im sure.

New Topic/Question
Reply



MultiQuote











|