macb6497 - Viewing Profile

macb6497's Profile User Rating:

Reputation: -6 Shunned

Group:: Active Members
Active Posts:: 81 (0.07 per day)
Joined:: 25-December 09
Profile Views:: 1,887
Last Active:: Aug 21 2012 10:37 AM
Currently:: Offline

Previous Fields

Country:: US
OS Preference:: Linux
Favorite Browser:: FireFox
Favorite Processor:: Intel
Favorite Gaming Platform:: PC
Your Car:: Jeep
Dream Kudos:: 0

Latest Visitors

JackOfAllTrades
21 Aug 2012 - 10:50
modi123_1
21 Aug 2012 - 08:11
sungchoiok
14 Mar 2012 - 00:35
macosxnerd101
09 Mar 2012 - 20:45
Apokio
07 Mar 2012 - 15:21

macb6497 has not set their status

Posts I've Made

In Topic: Protocols/ports you shouldn't allow remote in production environme

Posted 21 Aug 2012

modi123_1, on 21 August 2012 - 12:47 PM, said:
You are using a firewall, right?

Yeah, this topic was created just for thoughts of what port shouldn't be open
In Topic: Future tech using only two protocols.

Posted 7 Mar 2012

supersloth, on 07 March 2012 - 03:12 PM, said:
let me simplify this for you and everyone: if you ever post that image again we will edit it out and replace it with something you do not like.

get it? got it? good.

yaaay now we can move on to the simplified hypothetical's.

Understood...

I guess it would be a bad time to show you this:

http://users.utu.fi/...1_rj12_rj45.jpg

This one's not even mine.

http://www.dreaminco...80852155378.png

http://www.dreaminco...02452096298.jpg

http://www.dreaminco...48189968916.jpg

If you simply use imagecopyresampled() you can not only control image size, but it drastically reduces your image size (in bytes), believe me, I know. It makes the user experience better. I person on my site can upload a 8MP file and it is reduced for them while still maintaining quality...

Not really though: Edit Profile, sig

"Your signature may contain:

Any number images
Images of any size
Any number of URLs
Any number of lines
"

dorknexus, on 07 March 2012 - 02:42 PM, said:
Quote
Signatures
Signatures should not be excessive in length. (about 4 lines of 65 characters)
Graphics must not exceed 400x80 (total width of entire signature)

Don't be bigot.

Now, what about this topic, thoughts?

I know assembly language, I could test it out on my local network...
In Topic: Future tech using only two protocols.

Posted 7 Mar 2012

dorknexus, on 07 March 2012 - 02:42 PM, said:
Quote
Signatures
Signatures should not be excessive in length. (about 4 lines of 65 characters)
Graphics must not exceed 400x80 (total width of entire signature)

I don't have a text signature.

Are you referring to my icon/avatar because your attached direct image and the resized one are both above 400 x 80?

If my icon, that's within guidelines, if the attached picture, why don't they include a resizing script when "move_uploaded_file()"?

But for the topic, I'm only referring to the application layer now. I haven't studied all the other protocols.
In Topic: Future tech using only two protocols.

Posted 7 Mar 2012

modi123_1, on 07 March 2012 - 02:09 PM, said:
Quote
I always link that as a signature.

That image isn't in your signature.

I use it AS a signature. You search for the picture you find my work, you find my work you find me. Finding me will lead to finding information about me, which is why people leave signatures...
In Topic: Future tech using only two protocols.

Posted 7 Mar 2012

modi123_1, on 07 March 2012 - 01:47 PM, said:
A better question - what's up with that giant image? how is that related?

I always link that as a signature. The picture on my computer is large so it displays large when uploaded.

What's up with yours?