Dworza - Viewing Profile

Dworza's Profile User Rating:

Reputation: 6 Worker

Group:: Contributors
Active Posts:: 174 (0.21 per day)
Joined:: 13-February 11
Profile Views:: 1,267
Last Active:: May 03 2013 03:35 AM
Currently:: Offline

Previous Fields

Country:: CZ
OS Preference:: Who Cares
Favorite Browser:: Chrome
Favorite Processor:: Who Cares
Favorite Gaming Platform:: PC
Your Car:: Who Cares
Dream Kudos:: 25

Latest Visitors

darek9576
23 Jan 2013 - 17:18
macosxnerd101
07 Nov 2012 - 07:15
JackOfAllTrades
07 Nov 2012 - 06:55
modi123_1
07 Nov 2012 - 06:54
karabasf
28 Aug 2012 - 06:46
nialler
29 May 2012 - 07:24
Sinned
19 Jan 2012 - 13:39
Renagado
26 Apr 2011 - 15:11
nandureddy
06 Apr 2011 - 22:50
DeckC
21 Mar 2011 - 13:47

Dworza has not set their status

Posts I've Made

In Topic: Value without sence, when using cons instance

Posted 6 Apr 2013

JackOfAllTrades, on 06 April 2013 - 04:06 AM, said:
You need to create a copy constructor and assignment operator for the Matrix class.

Rule of three

You can see my copy constructor in the code in my original post. And I don't have there overloaded operator "=". As I've said - for normal Matrix instances it works well, it doesn't work only for const Matrix instances.. Wouldn't you mind to show me some sample code, what did you have on your mind with creation of copy constructor and assignment operator?
In Topic: Person Class, Have A Counter To Increase On Each New Object

Posted 29 Nov 2012
And whats the problem? Just add personCount++; (btw - variable type for personCount is missing)to your constructor...And then write getPersonCount method:
```
private int getPersonCount(){
   return personCount;
}
```
In Topic: Unpublished snippet

Posted 7 Nov 2012

no2pencil, on 07 November 2012 - 07:40 AM, said:
Another way to look at it is like this :

If the code or method of programming isn't something that is easily replicated, then you may not be in the best place to be teaching it to others.

I think you didn't get it well - of course, it can be easily replicated...But it would take me time to delete my own code,that's not needed for tutorial, write all the comments again and so... For the tutorial is needed code that has cca 200 lines ...My code has now 5000 lines....Chmm as I see, it would be much easier to write it from scratch than to edit my project

I only wanted to say, that it's a pitty, that it will take me again some time to write that tutorial...and the time is, what I don't have in these days :-(
In Topic: Unpublished snippet

Posted 7 Nov 2012

no2pencil, on 07 November 2012 - 07:26 AM, said:
Question : When you wrote this snippet, surely you saved the file in order to compile it?

It's a little bit difficult ... I needed to write my own project, so I wrote at first a snippet for DIC community and then I've used this as a template for my own project...So yes...I've got code of this project, but it also contains a lot of other code so it's really complex and it would be needed to walk through whole code and edit it quite a lot, to make this code enough simple for a tutorial :-S
In Topic: Unpublished snippet

Posted 7 Nov 2012

macosxnerd101, on 07 November 2012 - 07:19 AM, said:
You should have received a PM with the reason why your snippet was disapproved.

I dind't get any message...Can that snippet be found somewhere yet? Cuz I don't have any backup of this code and I don't wanna to write it from scratch again :-S I wasn't sure if I shall post it as a snippet or a tutorial and then I decided to post it as a snippet...so sorry for choosing a wrong category