Achri's Profile User Rating: *****

Reputation: 8 Worker
Group:
Active Members
Active Posts:
52 (0.07 per day)
Joined:
18-June 11
Profile Views:
869
Last Active:
User is offline Jun 26 2012 06:52 PM
Currently:
Offline

Previous Fields

Country:
US
OS Preference:
Who Cares
Favorite Browser:
Who Cares
Favorite Processor:
Who Cares
Favorite Gaming Platform:
Who Cares
Your Car:
Who Cares
Dream Kudos:
0
Icon   Achri has not set their status

Posts I've Made

  1. In Topic: Game Development Tools/Resources

    Posted 16 Apr 2012

    I've been struggling with learning game architectures. This paper by Michael Doherty might be quite a few years old, but it managed to give me some direction that I didn't seem to find elsewhere on the net.

    A Software Architecture for Games

    I believe it is a component based design?
  2. In Topic: Command Line compiling/Jarring

    Posted 30 Mar 2012

    View Postjon.kiparsky, on 30 March 2012 - 10:44 AM, said:

    The 1.7 release seems to be causing more trouble than usual. You might see if you can get up to 1.7 jre on your machine, or else cut back to 1.6 for your jdk. I'm not using 1.7 yet, it doesn't look like there's anything very exciting there for me and the headaches seem unwarranted. I'll be a late adopter on this one.


    Yes, I installed the 1.7 JRE and that fixed things(I can dclick 1.7 JARs and they run). I still see my 1.6 JRE in the 32 bit directory after installation though. At least I can run my programs made w/ 1.7 now. Thanks.
  3. In Topic: Command Line compiling/Jarring

    Posted 30 Mar 2012

    Command Prompt:
    C:\Users\Achri\Desktop\Mancala>java -jar Mancala.jar
    

    Starts my application, the JFrame window with the JPanels pops up.

    Window:
    C:\Users\Achri\Desktop\Mancala
    

    dclicking the Mancala.jar gives me the error:
    "Could not find the main class: MancalaMain. Program will exit.


    Since I created the .jar at the command prompt and the manifest is like so:
    Manifest-Version: 1.0
    Created-By: 1.7.0_02 (Oracle Corporation)
    Main-Class: MancalaMain
    
    


    When I double click, I am trying to open a .jar created using Java 1.7, but what Windows is actually using is still 1.6?
    And the command prompt just happens to know what to use?

    So should I somehow figure out how to force Windows to be using my Java 1.7 build, instead of the 1.6? I ran into a similar problem when I was creating .JARs in Eclipse, I had to change the compliance level to 1.6 or lower to dclick them outside of eclipse.
  4. In Topic: Trying to run a method from another class

    Posted 29 Mar 2012

    I'm also a little confused where 'seats' is coming from?
    If seats is a Seat, then seats.get does nothing? Because there is no get method inside of Seat(there's a getPrice and getCount). There are plenty more of these types of things.

    It would appear you left out code, or you included code that doesn't needed to be included.
  5. In Topic: Command Line compiling/Jarring

    Posted 29 Mar 2012

    Thank you both for your well written answers.

    I removed my packaging on my Mancala game I've been working on. And now I compiled and jarred it.
    Last question for the night:

    Why does this work:
    C:\Users\Achri\Desktop\Mancala>java -jar Mancala.jar
    

    but double clicking it, pops up

    "Could not find the main class: MancalaMain. Program will exit." ?

    My manifest file inside of the .jar:
    Manifest-Version: 1.0
    Created-By: 1.7.0_02 (Oracle Corporation)
    Main-Class: MancalaMain
    
    
    


    It shouldn't be the manifest file since I can run the program on the command line.

My Information

Member Title:
D.I.C Head
Age:
Age Unknown
Birthday:
Birthday Unknown
Gender:
Years Programming:
1
Programming Languages:
C++

Contact Information

E-mail:
Click here to e-mail me

Friends

Achri hasn't added any friends yet.

Comments

Page 1 of 1
  1. Photo

    stayscrisp Icon

    21 Jul 2011 - 06:07
    Thanks :)
    I will probably get round to extending my tutorials soon, I will be covering more data driven design first though.
  2. Photo

    stayscrisp Icon

    19 Jun 2011 - 14:55
    Well I don't think this is a situation where it shouldn't be used. If you look up singletons you will see the parts you don't have to include. It is not integral to my implementation.
  3. Photo

    stayscrisp Icon

    19 Jun 2011 - 05:29
    Why do you not want to use the singleton pattern?
Page 1 of 1