Pwn, on 26 Apr, 2009 - 08:38 AM, said:
firebolt, on 26 Apr, 2009 - 07:33 AM, said:
Wow. Sorry, but I almost completely disagree. I think it depends which Norton you use.
With what do you disagree? That it took me a whole day to fix Norton's problem, that Norton's sets your pc up as a proxy, that Norton's isn't the best, that Norton's would screw the pooch, or that I haven't used Kapersky?
I disagree with the fact that you've never used Kapersky. Don't you remember that drinking binge in Chicago? We woke up & there you were, Kapersky install meter spanning from 99% to 100%.
The shame...
& for the record, I've cleaned up a few messes that Norton has caused. I think that their ideal behind the antivirus is that if they bog the machine down enough, the end user will become so frustrated with waiting for websites to load that they simply won't use it any more. I recommend Avast to all of my customers, & anytime that it replaces Norton it almost always finds at least one or two "installers" left sitting in the temporary internet files folders.

New Topic/Question
This topic is locked



MultiQuote





|