</d.i.c>

Questions

  • (4 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

52 Replies - 4499 Views - Last Post: 28 September 2005 - 03:10 PM

#31 Nova Dragoon   User is offline

  • The Innocent Shall Suffer, Big Time
  • member icon

Reputation: 38
  • View blog
  • Posts: 6,169
  • Joined: 16-August 01

Re: </d.i.c>

Posted 27 September 2005 - 02:27 PM

Posted Image
Was This Post Helpful? 0
  • +
  • -

#32 eLliDKraM   User is offline

  • Pepè Le Pewn
  • member icon

Reputation: 7
  • View blog
  • Posts: 6,565
  • Joined: 13-August 05

Re: </d.i.c>

Posted 27 September 2005 - 02:31 PM

That would be so tasty...
Was This Post Helpful? 0
  • +
  • -

#33 hitokirisn   User is offline

  • flip ya. flip ya for real.
  • member icon

Reputation: 1
  • View blog
  • Posts: 982
  • Joined: 17-June 02

Re: </d.i.c>

Posted 28 September 2005 - 06:01 AM

Needs syrup

I <d.i.c.> with the girlies.

what what.
Was This Post Helpful? 0
  • +
  • -

#34 bja888   User is offline

  • D.I.C Head

Reputation: 0
  • View blog
  • Posts: 94
  • Joined: 09-September 05

Re: </d.i.c>

Posted 28 September 2005 - 09:34 AM

I have a question..... Why do you want to end deraming in code? If you know I am sure most of you know html and when it starts "</" its a "end" tag. So why does the logo in the corner want to end my dreams?

I suggest we go xhtml with "<dream.in.code/>"
Was This Post Helpful? 0
  • +
  • -

#35 bja888   User is offline

  • D.I.C Head

Reputation: 0
  • View blog
  • Posts: 94
  • Joined: 09-September 05

Re: </d.i.c>

Posted 28 September 2005 - 09:35 AM

Its ok, these people want to end web development all togeather.

Attached image(s)

  • Attached Image

Was This Post Helpful? 0
  • +
  • -

#36 supersloth   User is offline

  • serial frotteur - RUDEST MEMBER ON D.I.C.
  • member icon


Reputation: 4695
  • View blog
  • Posts: 28,516
  • Joined: 21-March 01

Re: </d.i.c>

Posted 28 September 2005 - 09:39 AM

bja888, on Sep 28 2005, 10:31 AM, said:

I have a question..... Why do you want to end deraming in code? If you know I am sure most of you know html and when it starts "</" its a "end" tag. So why does the logo in the corner want to end my dreams?

I suggest we go xhtml with "<dream.in.code/>"

because you touch yourself at night.
Was This Post Helpful? 0
  • +
  • -

#37 Nova Dragoon   User is offline

  • The Innocent Shall Suffer, Big Time
  • member icon

Reputation: 38
  • View blog
  • Posts: 6,169
  • Joined: 16-August 01

Re: </d.i.c>

Posted 28 September 2005 - 10:11 AM

bja888, on Sep 28 2005, 11:31 AM, said:

I have a question..... Why do you want to end deraming in code? If you know I am sure most of you know html and when it starts "</" its a "end" tag. So why does the logo in the corner want to end my dreams?

I suggest we go xhtml with "<dream.in.code/>"

<tag/> was actually a compromise in XHTML for the <BR/> tag so you didnt have to
do <br></br> for a line break.



and </dream.in.code> looks cooler than <dream.in.code>
Was This Post Helpful? 0
  • +
  • -

#38 dorknexus   User is offline

  • or something bad...real bad.
  • member icon

Reputation: 1272
  • View blog
  • Posts: 4,625
  • Joined: 02-May 04

Re: </d.i.c>

Posted 28 September 2005 - 10:28 AM

uhhh, i am pretty sure we looked it up and the "/" adds +10 </dic> points
Was This Post Helpful? 0
  • +
  • -

#39 bja888   User is offline

  • D.I.C Head

Reputation: 0
  • View blog
  • Posts: 94
  • Joined: 09-September 05

Re: </d.i.c>

Posted 28 September 2005 - 10:52 AM

Nova Dragoon, on Sep 28 2005, 11:08 AM, said:

bja888, on Sep 28 2005, 11:31 AM, said:

I have a question..... Why do you want to end deraming in code? If you know I am sure most of you know html and when it starts "</" its a "end" tag. So why does the logo in the corner want to end my dreams?

I suggest we go xhtml with "<dream.in.code/>"

<tag/> was actually a compromise in XHTML for the <BR/> tag so you didnt have to
do <br></br> for a line break.



and </dream.in.code> looks cooler than <dream.in.code>

Yes I know... thats why I diden't do <dream.in.code></dream.in.code>

I figured it was for design purpose...
If the char menu is written correctly why can't we have a correct logo?
Was This Post Helpful? 0
  • +
  • -

#40 bja888   User is offline

  • D.I.C Head

Reputation: 0
  • View blog
  • Posts: 94
  • Joined: 09-September 05

Re: </d.i.c>

Posted 28 September 2005 - 10:53 AM

Dark_Nexus, on Sep 28 2005, 11:25 AM, said:

uhhh, i am pretty sure we looked it up and the "/" adds +10 </dic> points

What language?
Was This Post Helpful? 0
  • +
  • -

#41 Nova Dragoon   User is offline

  • The Innocent Shall Suffer, Big Time
  • member icon

Reputation: 38
  • View blog
  • Posts: 6,169
  • Joined: 16-August 01

Re: </d.i.c>

Posted 28 September 2005 - 11:02 AM

bja888, on Sep 28 2005, 12:49 PM, said:

If the char menu is written correctly why can't we have a correct logo?

Whats this "we" business. out of all 6600++ members you are the only one to complain

you are in a vast vast minority


</dream.in.code> is hows its always been, and WE LIKE IT!
Was This Post Helpful? 0
  • +
  • -

#42 BlueCube   User is offline

  • THIS IS SPARTAAA
  • member icon

Reputation: 1
  • View blog
  • Posts: 3,594
  • Joined: 19-February 02

Re: </d.i.c>

Posted 28 September 2005 - 11:03 AM

bja888, on Sep 28 2005, 10:31 AM, said:

I have a question..... Why do you want to end deraming in code? If you know I am sure most of you know html and when it starts "</" its a "end" tag. So why does the logo in the corner want to end my dreams?

I suggest we go xhtml with "<dream.in.code/>"

We don't want to end "deraming in code", and yes we all do understand how simple HTML functions work.


</dream.in.code>



It looks cool.


edit: I just posted and then Nova's post came up too, I appolgize for the rewording the same ideas. However, it's good we think on the same page. :-)
Was This Post Helpful? 0
  • +
  • -

#43 bja888   User is offline

  • D.I.C Head

Reputation: 0
  • View blog
  • Posts: 94
  • Joined: 09-September 05

Re: </d.i.c>

Posted 28 September 2005 - 11:06 AM

I am done with this topic.
-BJA888



Thank You.
-Management
Was This Post Helpful? 0
  • +
  • -

#44 skyhawk133   User is offline

  • Head DIC Head
  • member icon

Reputation: 1981
  • View blog
  • Posts: 20,434
  • Joined: 17-March 01

Re: </d.i.c>

Posted 28 September 2005 - 11:27 AM

Move on people, nothin to see here. Keep movin... keep movin. *points at bja888's new member group*
Was This Post Helpful? 0
  • +
  • -

#45 dorknexus   User is offline

  • or something bad...real bad.
  • member icon

Reputation: 1272
  • View blog
  • Posts: 4,625
  • Joined: 02-May 04

Re: </d.i.c>

Posted 28 September 2005 - 11:39 AM

HEADSHOT!!
Was This Post Helpful? 0
  • +
  • -
  • (4 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4