323 Replies - 47560 Views - Last Post: 19 January 2010 - 06:23 AM
#257
Re: f**k this site
Posted 16 January 2010 - 06:54 AM
I never saw Jamie before
1) without his hat
2) with his wife
1) without his hat
2) with his wife
#258
Re: f**k this site
Posted 16 January 2010 - 07:06 AM
the guys an idiot, out of all people to single out as being unwilling to help him he/she picks JackOfAllTrades LOL, he is the resident 24 hour a day C++ troll bot -__-
Firstly
And secondly your a douche, don't think we'll miss you around these parts
Quote
I swear that I will tell everybody i know about your prostitution.and i wont let anyone log in to this site...
Firstly
1833 guests, 96 members 5 anonymous members
And secondly your a douche, don't think we'll miss you around these parts
#260
Re: f**k this site
Posted 16 January 2010 - 08:24 AM
#262
Re: f**k this site
Posted 16 January 2010 - 12:43 PM
#263
Re: f**k this site
Posted 16 January 2010 - 12:56 PM
SwiftStriker00, on 16 Jan, 2010 - 03:05 AM, said:
The UltimateQeustionOfLifeUniverse & Everything Else
Consider the following C code:
Of course, the program will output 42, because SIX*NINE will be interpreted as 1+5*8+1=1+40+1=42, not as (1+5)*(8+1)=6*9=56.
Presumably meaning that the universe is written in C.
There are worse ways to code the universe. It's probably actually written in some kind of brainfuck-malbolge hybrid language, which would make some progress towards explaining Murphy's Law.
Consider the following C code:
#define SIX 1+5
#define NINE 8+1
int main()
{
printf("How much do you get if you mulitiply SIX by NINE? %i!",SIX*NINE");
}
Of course, the program will output 42, because SIX*NINE will be interpreted as 1+5*8+1=1+40+1=42, not as (1+5)*(8+1)=6*9=56.
Presumably meaning that the universe is written in C.
There are worse ways to code the universe. It's probably actually written in some kind of brainfuck-malbolge hybrid language, which would make some progress towards explaining Murphy's Law.
Next time, may I suggest a calculator..
#264
Re: f**k this site
Posted 16 January 2010 - 01:01 PM
I admit I was the mod who censored the title. I did this when it was placed in the site feedback because I didn't think that was an appropriate in that forum.
But to make it up to anyone who feels let down by the lack of aggressive language I submit the following:
note if you are offended by strong language don't click the link... just don't do it.
I'm SO F**KING ANGRY (warning this link contains techno)
That should make up for the gratuitous censorship....
But to make it up to anyone who feels let down by the lack of aggressive language I submit the following:
note if you are offended by strong language don't click the link... just don't do it.
I'm SO F**KING ANGRY (warning this link contains techno)
That should make up for the gratuitous censorship....
#266
Re: f**k this site
Posted 16 January 2010 - 02:50 PM
#267
Re: f**k this site
Posted 16 January 2010 - 03:34 PM
Show off. >_> Was too tired for that. 
"gabehabe @ 16 Jan, 2010 - 03:19 AM"
That's my excuse, anyway.
"gabehabe @ 16 Jan, 2010 - 03:19 AM"
That's my excuse, anyway.
This post has been edited by gabehabe: 16 January 2010 - 03:37 PM
#268
Re: f**k this site
Posted 16 January 2010 - 03:57 PM
k this tread iz gettin ub3r sux0rz lame
This post has been edited by V.C. Sniper: 16 January 2010 - 03:58 PM

New Topic/Question
This topic is locked






MultiQuote










|