[WolfCoder]

Dark_Nexus, on 20 Jan, 2010 - 07:21 AM, said:

Quote

My Spaghetti advice is similar to my video camcorder advice.

wtf?

WolfCoder, on 20 Jan, 2010 - 07:18 AM, said:

It's like the opening poster is a bot where the operator forgot to place the actual ad in the nonsense text block designed to defeat filters.

Especially if their name is SpectateSwamp as lots of these bot names are jibberish and/or just two random dictionary words thrown together.

edit:

Taking a look at their posts, I would have to say bot. Not sure what it's advertising though...

This post has been edited by WolfCoder: 20 January 2010 - 07:27 AM

[SpectateSwamp]

sonicpp, on 20 Jan, 2010 - 04:19 AM, said:

VB is for children who's mothers never loved them. Or the third best of triplets... never got the tit.

Can't stand you "C" elitest Perfect Perfects either. You can't jam C like I can this Wonder program. Probably not. Most most probably not.

[BenignDesign]

Methinks someone has issues.

[Core]

@SpectateSwamp What is exactly your point? For the last two posts you didn't provide a decent argument for what you claim to be so good.

[Raynes]

Heh, and people thing I'm smug. This guy is beating the drum from the other side.

[Gloin]

@Core>> That's because if he did, this would immediately be moved to the corner cubicle for being a serious discussion.

[SpectateSwamp]

Core, on 20 Jan, 2010 - 07:08 AM, said:

@SpectateSwamp What is exactly your point? For the last two posts you didn't provide a decent argument for what you claim to be so good.

I'm here to take you on; And your so called coding standards. To the CodeDaddy's eyes the program is always perfect. I have been jamming this spaghetti mess for years. Putting a noodle here another there. And Jam it again. Then stand back in wonder at the results; and so easy sometimes. Good design does that. Modular programs Phooie; double phooie

Nobody shares knowledge better than this. This program is the answer to everything.

[Raynes]

SpectateSwamp, on 20 Jan, 2010 - 07:28 AM, said:

Core, on 20 Jan, 2010 - 07:08 AM, said:

@SpectateSwamp What is exactly your point? For the last two posts you didn't provide a decent argument for what you claim to be so good.

I'm here to take you on; And your so called coding standards. To the CodeDaddy's eyes the program is always perfect. I have been jamming this spaghetti mess for years. Putting a noodle here another there. And Jam it again. Then stand back in wonder at the results; and so easy sometimes. Good design does that. Modular programs Phooie; double phooie

Nobody shares knowledge better than this. This program is the answer to everything.

A certain song by Trapt just started playing in my head.

BACK OFF, I'LL TAKE YOU ON! HEADSTRONG, TO TAKE ON ANYONE!

[TriggaMike]

SpectateSwamp, on 20 Jan, 2010 - 07:02 AM, said:

sonicpp, on 20 Jan, 2010 - 04:19 AM, said:

VB is for children who's mothers never loved them. Or the third best of triplets... never got the tit.

Can't stand you "C" elitest Perfect Perfects either. You can't jam C like I can this Wonder program. Probably not. Most most probably not.

If you're a real programmer you should be able to make more flexible, faster, and more robust applications faster in C, Java, C++, C#, or whatever language you prefer, but NOT VB. What does that second letter stand for? Basic?

PLEASE argue that some larger corporations use VB for their enterprise level software. Guess what? Larger Corporations are looking for a cheap product, not a good product. IMO VB is a cheap gutting of program that is used by people who neither have the time, nor conviction to actually program, or people who want results fast and dirty.

[Raynes]

TriggaMike, on 20 Jan, 2010 - 07:54 AM, said:

SpectateSwamp, on 20 Jan, 2010 - 07:02 AM, said:

sonicpp, on 20 Jan, 2010 - 04:19 AM, said:

VB is for children who's mothers never loved them. Or the third best of triplets... never got the tit.

Can't stand you "C" elitest Perfect Perfects either. You can't jam C like I can this Wonder program. Probably not. Most most probably not.

If you're a real programmer you should be able to make more flexible, faster, and more robust applications faster in C, Java, C++, C#, or whatever language you prefer, but NOT VB. What does that second letter stand for? Basic?

PLEASE argue that some larger corporations use VB for their enterprise level software. Guess what? Larger Corporations are looking for a cheap product, not a good product. IMO VB is a cheap gutting of program that is used by people who neither have the time, nor conviction to actually program, or people who want results fast and dirty.

I like you.

[Nykc]

Ooh this is getting good. An argument for VB with no standing ground, no foundation laid, no basis for your argument. Just a VB fanboy at this point. Please prove us wrong I would love to read about this debate.

[JackOfAllTrades]

Apparently y'all aren't acquainted with The Daily WTF, where our new pal SpectateSwamp is LEGENDARY.

[papuccino1]

My current job has me programming in VB.Net. I feel dirty everytime I get home.

[sonicpp]

Tell you what. You write an operating system with VB. Then we'll talk.

[NeoTifa]

... I'm supposed to be using VB to move some databases around at work. Meh. I went as far as reading 1 tutorial, and quit. There aren't any real good VBA tutorials out there, hardly any real support as far as I'm concerned (even here I get lost), and VB is just very broad. Besides, they're ending support with VB anyways and using Java for macros these days. Or so I heard. As I see it, from personal experience, VB code is like very ambiguous pseudocode used for the most basic of projects, done quick and dirty. Theres no real security for it, it's very broad, and gives me a fucking headache! Face it gramps, line numbers and gotos are a thing of the past. Sure, its good for hobbying, but industries frown upon it these days and see it as bad form. You're outnumbered. Us young whippersnappers are taking you outta business!

This post has been edited by NeoTifa: 20 January 2010 - 09:35 AM