[JackOfAllTrades]

Doesn't look like it from the changelog. The greasemonkey script written by Atli works very well. I modified it so it only numbers scripts with more than 10 lines, but otherwise functions extremely well.

[moopet]

skyhawk133, on 10 June 2010 - 04:04 PM, said:

That's the one we're using moopet. Have they updated it any to include line numbers and such?

I think... I think that somewhere in the middle of me typing away I forgot what the OP was. So no

[moopet]

I just noticed that code now has numbers and is full width. Outstanding!

[eZACKe]

Just me or is the code taking a little while to load now?

[skyhawk133]

You guys are gonna have to pick your battles. Yes, the code takes a while to "highlight" because the syntax highlighter has to come back in and edit all of it in the DOM. I've tried to set it up so it "falls back" gracefully until the syntax highlighter loads.


Please though, provide feedback. It looks like it's working much better than the original version of the script, and I think it provides most of the functionality everyone wanted, the only drawback is it is a bit slower because it's a MUCH more heavyweight script (lots more going on in the background)

[m-e-g-a-z]

I found it to load ok, although, it would be good if there was some sort of scroll bar for the code itself as some people post long bits of code. Looking good though, especially being able to copy the full code onto the clipboard without line numbers .

[eZACKe]

I like it too, but have to agree a scroll bar could be nice. Having 400 lines of code without a scroll bar can be a little excessive.

[Atli]

It doesn't seem to highlight much, though. Just look at the Javascript on page 2 of this thread. It doesn't even highlight the comments.

[KingCuddles]

skyhawk133, on 25 June 2010 - 01:30 PM, said:

You guys are gonna have to pick your battles. Yes, the code takes a while to "highlight" because the syntax highlighter has to come back in and edit all of it in the DOM. I've tried to set it up so it "falls back" gracefully until the syntax highlighter loads.


Please though, provide feedback. It looks like it's working much better than the original version of the script, and I think it provides most of the functionality everyone wanted, the only drawback is it is a bit slower because it's a MUCH more heavyweight script (lots more going on in the background)

Sadly I am finding it MUCH slower than before, although I will admit it does look sexy as hell.

But if there was a poll on the matter speed would get my vote as at the minute pages are taking wayyy to long to load, and I have the attention span of an fish .

[skyhawk133]

I think right now the new one is waiting till everything on the page finishes before it runs, this includes ads, scripts, etc.

Let me see if I can make it load right away.

[macosxnerd101]

One thing I noticed is that inline comments aren't highlighted differently, and they run onto different lines. See the below screenshot, with the comment selected by my cursor.



I'm not sure if this happens with multi-line comments, but I'll test it out:

/* This is a test.
This is a test. 
This is a test.
This is a test.
*/

public class HelloWorld{
   public static void main(String[] args){
       System.out.println("Hello, world!");
   } //end main()
} //end class

This post has been edited by macosxnerd101: 25 June 2010 - 05:09 PM

[AdamSpeight2008]

skyhawk133, on 10 June 2010 - 02:43 AM, said:

The only issue I can find is that it seems you HAVE to specify a language. I'm looking through the BBCODE documentation to see if I can dynamically populate the "brush" (language) some how.

Any other suggestions/scripts that you've seen in the wild, especially on forums?

What about having a similar method to the member button? Only this time it is a list of languages. There must be a way of dynamically specifying the brush, the default being the PlainText one.

Edit: Something like this (it's in Italian)
Edit: and this

[moopet]

KingCuddles, on 25 June 2010 - 08:54 PM, said:

skyhawk133, on 25 June 2010 - 01:30 PM, said:

You guys are gonna have to pick your battles. Yes, the code takes a while to "highlight" because the syntax highlighter has to come back in and edit all of it in the DOM. I've tried to set it up so it "falls back" gracefully until the syntax highlighter loads.


Please though, provide feedback. It looks like it's working much better than the original version of the script, and I think it provides most of the functionality everyone wanted, the only drawback is it is a bit slower because it's a MUCH more heavyweight script (lots more going on in the background)

Sadly I am finding it MUCH slower than before, although I will admit it does look sexy as hell.

But if there was a poll on the matter speed would get my vote as at the minute pages are taking wayyy to long to load, and I have the attention span of an fish .

For at least the last couple of months DIC pages have been often taking ~20 seconds to load for me (at home and at work) so I haven't noticed anything different with the pretty code.

[jaydscape]

Easy enough just to click the view source. Then copy that. I use FF maybe it's different on other browsers.

[KingCuddles]

moopet, on 26 June 2010 - 12:43 AM, said:

For at least the last couple of months DIC pages have been often taking ~20 seconds to load for me (at home and at work) so I haven't noticed anything different with the pretty code.

It has also stopped taking ages for me as well .