Through the last few months we've seen the emergence of various new takes on how the desktop should operate, how it should look, and even down to the target markets. I can't say I'm a fan of what's been done so far, but a quick write up on what I have experimented on:
Unity

Designed to be used primarily with touchscreens and the coming tablet market by Ubuntu, this GUI made its infamous debut in the 11.x releases.
Noticeable differences from gnome 2 are the integration of the windows manipulation and title bars into a global top bar. Icons and launchers are moved to the side, which disappear until moused over.
While this is brilliant for a touch screen interface, I found it driving me absolutely mad on a desktop machine, involving far too much dynamic menus, rearrangement, and space between items.
Gnome 3

Not far behind was Gnome 3, making its appearance in the 11.1 release of Ubuntu, and the 15 release of Fedora. Like Unity, it involves far heavier focus on the top menu.
Annoyances that I've observed up to this point are difficulty to quickly open multiple instances of a window on default, multiple clicks to even get into the menus, lack of minimize and maximize buttons on default, and the presence of a quick launcher that effectively masks other applications behind another few clicks.
(Granted it is more tolerable than Unity.)
Cinnamon

If there's one GUI that's gotten my attention, it's cinnamon. No extras on the menu, straightforward, and retains the classic gnome2 feel. While it's still young, reaching version 1.x only a few weeks ago, it shows some serious promise in restoring sanity to the desktop environment instead of trying to reinvent everything.
----------
I'll experiment more with OpenBox and Enlightenment as I get some time. More on my list to test are XFCE, KDE4, and anything else recommended.
So what are your opinions of the new crop of GUIs surfacing?

New Topic/Question


MultiQuote





|