I have to prove that graph homomorphism between any undirected graph G and complete graph K3 is in NP.
However, this problem is exactly the same as 3 - colourability problem. So my question is: if i show that 3-colourability is in NP, do i show my original case?
Thanks for answers.
Proving a problem is NP.
Page 1 of 13 Replies - 2036 Views - Last Post: 23 February 2012 - 07:28 PM
Replies To: Proving a problem is NP.
#2
Re: Proving a problem is NP.
Posted 23 February 2012 - 05:25 PM
well if you prove that the 2 problems are equivalent and that one of them is in NP, then you're good. But you have to prove they are equivalent first.
#3
Re: Proving a problem is NP.
Posted 23 February 2012 - 07:06 PM
How are these two problems equivalent?
Also, that homomorphism problem is solvable in constant time, so of course it's in NP as well.
Nevermind, I have mistaken "homomorphism" for "isomorphism". It's not constant of course. Easy to prove it's NP using verifiers. Still don't see how it's equivalent to 3-colorability though.
Nevermind, I have mistaken "homomorphism" for "isomorphism". It's not constant of course. Easy to prove it's NP using verifiers. Still don't see how it's equivalent to 3-colorability though.
This post has been edited by Nikitin: 23 February 2012 - 07:13 PM
#4
Re: Proving a problem is NP.
Posted 23 February 2012 - 07:28 PM
I'm going to move this to Computer Science. I know I've moved similar topics of yours to CS before. Please post in the appropriate section. Thanks!
Page 1 of 1

New Topic/Question
Reply



MultiQuote






|