2 Replies - 34047 Views - Last Post: 04 January 2013 - 04:30 AM

#1 Mylo   User is offline

  • Knows all, except most.

Reputation: 265
  • View blog
  • Posts: 747
  • Joined: 11-October 11

Integrated graphics being faster than card

Posted 23 December 2012 - 06:37 AM

Hi, while compiling some DirectX examples, I have noticed that when using my integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000) I achieve ~3000fps, however, using my graphics card (NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M), I only achieve ~600fps. I have disabled VSync in the graphics settings. I choose what device runs the application via the context menu in windows. Run with graphics processor -> (device).

This is only with things I compile seemingly. I had the same issue with my previous computers when learning OpenGL. However, if I play any other commercial games, the integrated graphics is far slower as expected. This isn't a problem by any means, but I'd be interested to know why.

Is This A Good Question/Topic? 1
  • +

Replies To: Integrated graphics being faster than card

#2 Gorian   User is offline

  • ninja DIC
  • member icon


Reputation: 156
  • View blog
  • Posts: 1,856
  • Joined: 28-June 08

Re: Integrated graphics being faster than card

Posted 26 December 2012 - 02:49 PM

Not really sure, but it is an intriguing questions. I'd assume that is a PCIe card? I am wondering if it has to do with the PCIe bus being slower than the integrated graphics, given the latter is closer to the CPU? Just a wild guess.
Was This Post Helpful? 0
  • +
  • -

#3 calvinthedestroyer   User is offline

  • D.I.C Lover

Reputation: 173
  • View blog
  • Posts: 1,941
  • Joined: 13-October 07

Re: Integrated graphics being faster than card

Posted 04 January 2013 - 04:30 AM

What would happen if you got a (Intel HD Graphics 4000) as a separate video card and installed it in place of the (NVIDIA GeForce GT 630M)

I wonder if you will get the same performance as the integrated card?
Was This Post Helpful? 0
  • +
  • -

Page 1 of 1