Partition of Set
Page 1 of 114 Replies - 2213 Views - Last Post: 30 September 2013 - 11:08 AM
#1
Partition of Set
Posted 30 September 2013 - 09:20 AM
I don't understand that it's asking me number of sets in a partition. Lets say A = {a,b,c,d,e,f}
a, b, c, d , e, f are the elements of A. Would this be a partition,
A = {{a,b,c},{d,e,f}} ? Would {a,b,c} be a partition of A? If so, what am I answer to how many sets are in the first partition of A? In the partition, there are 3 elements, and its asking me sets.
Replies To: Partition of Set
#2
Re: Partition of Set
Posted 30 September 2013 - 09:27 AM
This post has been edited by mostyfriedman: 30 September 2013 - 09:27 AM
#3
Re: Partition of Set
Posted 30 September 2013 - 09:32 AM
Or in more formal terms: For all s in S, there exists some p in P s.t. s in p. (feel free to replace "For all" with "upside down A" and so forth)
#4
Re: Partition of Set
Posted 30 September 2013 - 09:36 AM
So will the original question hold this partition:
{{Maine, Massachusetts}, {New Hampshire}, {Vermont}, {Rhode Island}, {Connecticut}}, giving me the answer 5?
#5
Re: Partition of Set
Posted 30 September 2013 - 09:40 AM
deprosun, on 30 September 2013 - 11:36 AM, said:
Consider e. Is there a set p in your partition s.t. e is in p?
(hint: a partition is a collection of sets)
Quote
{{Maine, Massachusetts}, {New Hampshire}, {Vermont}, {Rhode Island}, {Connecticut}}, giving me the answer 5?
Yes, this is a correct partition according to the specified relation.
#6
Re: Partition of Set
Posted 30 September 2013 - 09:42 AM
This post has been edited by deprosun: 30 September 2013 - 09:43 AM
#7
Re: Partition of Set
Posted 30 September 2013 - 09:45 AM
#8
Re: Partition of Set
Posted 30 September 2013 - 09:47 AM
#9
Re: Partition of Set
Posted 30 September 2013 - 09:59 AM
(actually, this is a little harder than I made it sound, but it's fun to think about)
#10
Re: Partition of Set
Posted 30 September 2013 - 10:24 AM
This post has been edited by deprosun: 30 September 2013 - 10:25 AM
#11
Re: Partition of Set
Posted 30 September 2013 - 10:29 AM
I get five partitions. (using the definition above, which is the standard one)
#12
Re: Partition of Set
Posted 30 September 2013 - 10:52 AM
#13
Re: Partition of Set
Posted 30 September 2013 - 11:03 AM
{{1,2,3}}
{{1,2},{3}}
{{1,3},{2}}
{{3,2},{1}}
{{1},{2},{3}}
There can be no others. Proof by assertion for the moment, since a real proof is more tedious than informative, but you may feel free to prove it if you like. Use the definition of a partition. (no non-empty members, represents each element of S exactly once)
The math for the general case is found under the heading of "Bell's Number".
#14
Re: Partition of Set
Posted 30 September 2013 - 11:07 AM
#15
Re: Partition of Set
Posted 30 September 2013 - 11:08 AM

New Topic/Question
Reply


MultiQuote



|