[modi123_1]

Folks.. folks.. folks. I can probably clarify a few things. Looking up the email address the poster dropped, and piecing together the hints in the first post, it seems folks are focusing on the term 'investor' wrong. I am getting the platform "look like alibaba" is more like kickstarter where you have projects and folks can select ones to invest in.

The investors are not for this cat's own business, but folks looking to use his site to match up to projects.

I figure this guy would make a cut off any transaction once it gets going.

Per the FB page:

Quote

SEEKINVESTORS is there to help Project Owners, Inventors, find Investors.
SEEKINVESTORS is also there to help Investors to find projects on which to invest.


Long Description
SEEKINVESTORS IS a CLUB
SEEKINVESTORS IS a SHOP
SEEKINVESTORS IS your PLATFORM if you are a Project Onwer or an Investor

[astonecipher]

And you are probably right. BUT, if any of the people looking were thinking this had a fool's shot at having a worthy track record, some of those groups would cut in on a few shares and fund the kick start itself, so they could get a cut of the cut.

I haven't talked to my finacial expert in a long time, but he would be wondering why investment firms wouldn't back something that, in theory, could make money on its own. Now, if it doesn't make money, why would someone invest, sweat equity or monitary?

If you had a platform moving $100 per user per month ( 100 x 10000 =1,000,000) average. And the platform keeps 2%. you backed it at a 20% stake, you would have a $4000 roi without doing anything. That may be best case scenario, but $100 as an average is nothing in investment circles, my boss drops $10k without blinking on ideas.

[no2pencil]

Atli, on 16 August 2016 - 10:04 PM, said:

Ollivier, on 16 August 2016 - 10:12 PM, said:

I have 2000 investors registered but cannot provide « names » here. I can say there are Banks, Hedge Fund, Governments, Individuals and groups of individuals with money to invest.

This kind of brings me right back to my original question: with such an impressive range of investors, why aren't you hiring people?

Because it's far less damaging to the investor if they risk potential vs risking capitol. That tells me all that I need to know about what someone thinks of their own venture. If they can't put money behind it, I don't put my work into it. To mirror that, someone willing to take "free" work doesn't value the end product. It's lose/lose.