i can do the same way for call header files, instead functions?
19 Replies - 1830 Views - Last Post: 19 April 2019 - 11:00 AM
#16
Re: C\C++: why ANSI C don't have GotoXY and others?
Posted 19 April 2019 - 08:20 AM
yes.. i'm doing 1st for windows, because is what i use 
i can do the same way for call header files, instead functions?
i can do the same way for call header files, instead functions?
#17
Re: C\C++: why ANSI C don't have GotoXY and others?
Posted 19 April 2019 - 09:49 AM
Quote
i can do the same way for call header files, instead functions?
What? Please elaborate.
Jim
#18
Re: C\C++: why ANSI C don't have GotoXY and others?
Posted 19 April 2019 - 09:52 AM
i mean instead functions, can i use header files:
??
#if defined(_WIN16)
#include windows.h
#else
#include linux.h
#endif
??
#19
Re: C\C++: why ANSI C don't have GotoXY and others?
Posted 19 April 2019 - 10:49 AM
What good will headers be without functions? Basically you will probably need both headers and source files.
Jim
Jim
#20
Re: C\C++: why ANSI C don't have GotoXY and others?
Posted 19 April 2019 - 11:00 AM
thank you so much for all to all

New Topic/Question
Reply




MultiQuote


|