155 Replies - 13356 Views - Last Post: 04 May 2009 - 08:17 PM
#138
Re: Calculate this~!
Posted 07 February 2009 - 03:54 AM
Are you just referring to the 8 syllables or were you looking for something else?
#139
Re: Calculate this~!
Posted 07 February 2009 - 10:13 AM
It was something else.....try counting.
#140
Re: Calculate this~!
Posted 21 February 2009 - 12:09 PM
Well here is the solution:
Solution:
3,1 4 1 5 9
2 6 5 3 5 8
9 7 9
3 2 3 8 4 6
That's Pi!
Let's try this one:
As I was going to Saint Ives,
I crossed the path of seven wives.
Every wife had seven sacks,
Every sack had seven cats,
Every cat had seven kittens,
Kittens, cats, sacks, wives,
How many were going to Saint Ives?
Solution:
3,1 4 1 5 9
2 6 5 3 5 8
9 7 9
3 2 3 8 4 6
That's Pi!
Let's try this one:
As I was going to Saint Ives,
I crossed the path of seven wives.
Every wife had seven sacks,
Every sack had seven cats,
Every cat had seven kittens,
Kittens, cats, sacks, wives,
How many were going to Saint Ives?
#142
Re: Calculate this~!
Posted 27 February 2009 - 05:23 PM
KYA, on 22 Dec, 2008 - 05:05 PM, said:
OK. Next math problem:
File's attached. Paint was being retarded. It's a series.
File's attached. Paint was being retarded. It's a series.
How DARE you use proprietary formats for reasons other than the fact that the recipient requests it/demands it/thinks that the format's software is better and refuses to install the free alternative. (Like my mom who refuses to try OpenOffice even though it's perfectly fine). Many of us know there are freely avalable alternatives to M$ Word. (If I am ranting, I forgot I wasn't on a Linux forum).
#143
Re: Calculate this~!
Posted 28 February 2009 - 12:33 PM
Quote
How DARE you use proprietary formats for reasons other than the fact that the recipient requests it/demands
Then try my problem as no format is needed.
#144
Re: Calculate this~!
Posted 22 March 2009 - 02:29 PM
Apparently this thread has died, so while my previous questions lies in purgatory waiting for a answer I shall give a mini question to revive the thread:
What is the smallest integer greater than 0 that can be written entirely with zeros and ones and is evenly divisible by 225?
What is the smallest integer greater than 0 that can be written entirely with zeros and ones and is evenly divisible by 225?
#145
Re: Calculate this~!
Posted 09 April 2009 - 11:40 AM
Unless you were thinking of the binary number 11100001
I would say 11,111,111,100
I would say 11,111,111,100
#146
Re: Calculate this~!
Posted 09 April 2009 - 05:40 PM
Quote
Unless you were thinking of the binary number 11100001
I would say 11,111,111,100
I would say 11,111,111,100
And we've got a winner!
(.) (.) (.) (.) (.) <----Cookies for you.
This post has been edited by BigAnt: 09 April 2009 - 05:40 PM
#147
Re: Calculate this~!
Posted 09 April 2009 - 06:17 PM
Wohoo!! You know how to please me..
For those who wonder how I came up with the answer, a short explanation..
First I calculated the prime factors of 225 = 9 * 5 * 5.
So the number to find had to be divisible by both 9 and 25.
The only way a number that consists of only 0's and 1's could be divisible by 9 is if it contains an exact multiple of nine 1's (and arbitrary many 0's) because if a number is divisible by nine, then the sum of the digits has to be a multiple of 9.
Ex: 45 is divisible by 9 and 4+5 = 9
The smallest number containing nine 1's is 111,111,111 but that is not divisible by 25. In fact, any number containing only 0's and 1's that is divisible by 25 must also be divisible by 100. Therefor I multiplied the nine 1's by 100 and thus came up with the answer. Magic!!
I'm gonne try to come up with a new problem but if anyone else has one, feel free to post it.
For those who wonder how I came up with the answer, a short explanation..
First I calculated the prime factors of 225 = 9 * 5 * 5.
So the number to find had to be divisible by both 9 and 25.
The only way a number that consists of only 0's and 1's could be divisible by 9 is if it contains an exact multiple of nine 1's (and arbitrary many 0's) because if a number is divisible by nine, then the sum of the digits has to be a multiple of 9.
Ex: 45 is divisible by 9 and 4+5 = 9
The smallest number containing nine 1's is 111,111,111 but that is not divisible by 25. In fact, any number containing only 0's and 1's that is divisible by 25 must also be divisible by 100. Therefor I multiplied the nine 1's by 100 and thus came up with the answer. Magic!!
I'm gonne try to come up with a new problem but if anyone else has one, feel free to post it.
#148
Re: Calculate this~!
Posted 09 April 2009 - 06:31 PM
@BigAnt:
In reply to your first question, ONE is going to St. Ives. Die Hard with a Vengence FTW.
In reply to your first question, ONE is going to St. Ives. Die Hard with a Vengence FTW.
#149
Re: Calculate this~!
Posted 09 April 2009 - 06:31 PM
Linear Feedback Shift Register
Find the (shortest) initializing bitstring and the recursive function that produces the bitstring,
1001110 1001110 1001110 ... (continues with the same pattern)
(modulo-2 arithmetics apply without carry)
Find the (shortest) initializing bitstring and the recursive function that produces the bitstring,
1001110 1001110 1001110 ... (continues with the same pattern)
(modulo-2 arithmetics apply without carry)
#150
Re: Calculate this~!
Posted 09 April 2009 - 07:29 PM
Quote
@BigAnt:
In reply to your first question, ONE is going to St. Ives. Die Hard with a Vengence FTW.
In reply to your first question, ONE is going to St. Ives. Die Hard with a Vengence FTW.
Yep
#151
Re: Calculate this~!
Posted 10 April 2009 - 12:10 AM
An integer minus another, divided by, the second integer minus the first gives what??
Its pretty easy...
Its pretty easy...
This post has been edited by firebolt: 10 April 2009 - 12:11 AM
#152
Re: Calculate this~!
Posted 10 April 2009 - 03:47 AM
Firebolt>> -1
In my question I'm looking for a specific bitstring of a specific length and a recursive function that reproduces the bitstring I posted.
ex:
Bitstring: 1101 where [x(0) = 1, x(1) = 1, x(2) = 0, x(3) = 1]
Recursive function: x(2) = x(1) + x(0)
Would produce the bitstring: 110 110 110 110 ...
In my question I'm looking for a specific bitstring of a specific length and a recursive function that reproduces the bitstring I posted.
ex:
Bitstring: 1101 where [x(0) = 1, x(1) = 1, x(2) = 0, x(3) = 1]
Recursive function: x(2) = x(1) + x(0)
Would produce the bitstring: 110 110 110 110 ...
This post has been edited by Gloin: 10 April 2009 - 06:57 AM

New Topic/Question


MultiQuote




|