39 Replies - 1594 Views - Last Post: 28 January 2009 - 09:29 AM
#1
100-0
Posted 22 January 2009 - 06:09 PM
What are they supposed to do? Stop trying and missing shots on purpose because the other team sucks that much?
Replies To: 100-0
#2
Re: 100-0
Posted 22 January 2009 - 06:13 PM
Competition is what makes the world go around. Apologizing for demolishing the enemy? You don't do that in the business world. No need to start teaching it here.
#3
Re: 100-0
Posted 22 January 2009 - 06:14 PM
#4
Re: 100-0
Posted 22 January 2009 - 11:29 PM
KYA, on 22 Jan, 2009 - 07:13 PM, said:
Competition is what makes the world go around. Apologizing for demolishing the enemy? You don't do that in the business world. No need to start teaching it here.
Reason for "The Slaughter Rule" : If you can get to that high of a lead...do you really think the other team is gonna come back? Because normally it takes a good long time to build up a lead of that size, and since it takes time, the time left to close the gap is usually relatively small anyway.
Why should there be needless playing if the unprojected outcome has a 1 in a trillion^5 chance of happening? Someone could die playing basketball for all we know.
This post has been edited by Locke: 22 January 2009 - 11:29 PM
#5
Re: 100-0
Posted 22 January 2009 - 11:30 PM
ontopic: let the 2nd and 3rd string play, poor guys need it
#6
Re: 100-0
Posted 23 January 2009 - 03:39 AM
BigAnt said:
Oh noes! The team continued to score points during the entire game and their coach cheered at them!
That just goes beyond common sens to fight until the end!
Who would do such a thing!?!?
#7
Re: 100-0
Posted 23 January 2009 - 06:43 AM
Quote
That just goes beyond common sens to fight until the end!
Who would do such a thing!?!? tongue.gif
I would cheer if my team could get 100 point skunk too
#8
Re: 100-0
Posted 23 January 2009 - 07:36 AM
Quote
Someone never studied Business Ethics.
This post has been edited by nofear217: 23 January 2009 - 07:37 AM
#9
Re: 100-0
Posted 23 January 2009 - 07:41 AM
nofear217, on 23 Jan, 2009 - 07:36 AM, said:
Quote
Someone never studied Business Ethics.
I'm sorry. Is the goal of starting a business to fail? In what world would you possibly want to not do well. If you have the opportunity to corner the market, then by all means do it. Has absolutely nothing to do with ethics, more like common sense.
I suppose we could all hold hands in a circle and sing kum by ya, but I'm not entirely sure how productive that would be.
This post has been edited by KYA: 23 January 2009 - 07:41 AM
#10
Re: 100-0
Posted 23 January 2009 - 07:42 AM
This post has been edited by bflosabre91: 23 January 2009 - 07:43 AM
#11
Re: 100-0
Posted 23 January 2009 - 10:35 AM
Quote
I suppose we could all hold hands in a circle and sing kum by ya, but I'm not entirely sure how productive that would be.
Sarcasm seems to be your common answer whenever anyone presents an opposing viewpoint. Ethics has everything to do with whether or not you will do anything and everything you can to 'win' in the business sector. Look at Enron for example, or US Steel and Standard Oil who did anything they could to corner the market.
I'm not saying that success is a bad thing, but methods to success should be observed.
#12
Re: 100-0
Posted 23 January 2009 - 11:26 AM
Quote
I'm not saying that success is a bad thing, but methods to success should be observed.
Well what Enron and stuff did was illegal, there was no rule against slaughtering the opposing team, and hence they did not break any rules, and did what any team would do, win the game. Its not their fault the other team sucked so much. Why should they have to miss shots on purpose, or get less play time/waste time down.
#13
Re: 100-0
Posted 23 January 2009 - 11:48 AM
#14
Re: 100-0
Posted 23 January 2009 - 11:51 AM
#15
Re: 100-0
Posted 23 January 2009 - 12:32 PM
KYA, on 23 Jan, 2009 - 08:41 AM, said:
Correct me if I'm wrong...but high school sports does not a business make. The players are there (most of the time) of their own volition. They wanted to play, that's why they tried out/signed up. If they don't make a good team...it's not necessarily their fault...but there's a point where it's just courtesy to not be total dicks to that team.
I agree, the losing coach should have forfeited. But the winning coach should have (and may actually have) put in the worst players on the team. They are both at fault.
Linkowiezi, on 23 Jan, 2009 - 04:39 AM, said:
That just goes beyond common sens to fight until the end!
Who would do such a thing!?!?
That's not a fight. That's the equivalent of a merciless slaughter of perfectly innocent people. A fight is when you're down like...6 points.
This post has been edited by Locke: 23 January 2009 - 12:34 PM

New Topic/Question



MultiQuote








|